On Mon, Jul 7, 2014, at 07:45 AM, Gert Doering wrote: > Nah. This should not impair ping from the server through openvpn to the > LAN address of the client. It's all "single machine left and right", > as far as the routing stacks are concerned. > > Now, if ping to the LAN interface of the client works, but pinging to > other hosts on the LAN fails, then we're into "forward=1" and "do you > have a route back?" land...
I've posted, above, the both the sysctls and the routes I have. Having mentioned there my suspected missing route, is that the "do you have a route back?" you're referncing here? > Or it might come from "ifconfig-push". Remember that the second > "address" in ifconfig-push is really a netmask if you run topology subnet) Yes, just got that figured out in previous post. Thanks for confirming. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft _______________________________________________ Openvpn-users mailing list Openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users
