When I compare your server config with mine then I don`t see
a route to the tunnel wich in my config is present.
> Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 12:04:19 -0800
> From:
jbo...@meridianenv.com
> To:
openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Openvpn-users] Issue getting to LAN behind
VPN Server
>
>
>
> On 1/6/2016 11:38 AM, Morten Christensen wrote:
> >
> > Den 05-01-2016 kl. 19:34 skrev Jeff Boyce:
> >> Greetings -
> >>
> >> I have a detailed description of my issue posted
over on the Forum, but
> >> am not getting any responses.
> >>
> >> My issue description is posted at
> >>
https://forums.openvpn.net/topic20369.html.
> >>
> >> I believe that my problem is a routing issue,
but I have exhausted my
> >> avenues of research and knowledge. I am hoping
someone with an eye for
> >> routing issues might be able to spot where my
issue is located and offer
> >> a recommendation.
> >
> > I have looked at your forum description.
> > You have good chances to be on the wrong list. This
looks like routing
> > problems between your other servers and their
default gateway.
> >
> I tend to agree, that I think this is a routing problem.
But the
> problem only occurs trying to access the other servers
through the VPN,
> otherwise the other servers do not appear to have any
routing or default
> gateway problem. And since many of the issue discussed on
this list are
> routing related, this seemed like the most appropriate
place to discuss
> it. I am not aware of another list that might be more
applicable.
>
> > What happens when you try a traceroute from the
other server .53 to
> > the vpn-servers tunnel ip 10.9.8.1 ?
> >
> Ah, good question and something else that I can test and
get feedback
> that might help diagnose this better. I will try when I
make a
> connection from the remote end tonight.
>
> > Have you considered starting with the simple
solution no. 3, and if
> > that works go on with no. 4 ?
> >
> I have considered it, yes. But while solution #3 may seem
simple to
> some people, it seems more confusing to me. My comfort
level with
> iptables is even less than my knowledge of routing. So I
don't think I
> would really solve my problem, as much as just switch
what problem I am
> working on. Thanks for your input, it is appreciated as
you have given
> me something physical to test.
>
> > --
> > Morten Christensen
> >
> >
