2017-10-02 23:46 GMT+05:00 Xen <l...@xenhideout.nl>:
> Илья Шипицин schreef op 02-10-2017 20:08:
>
>
> 2017-10-02 22:40 GMT+05:00 Xen <l...@xenhideout.nl>:
>>
>> Илья Шипицин schreef op 02-10-2017 19:31:
>>>
>>> consider the following setup
>>>
>>> office
>>> LAN1: 192.168.100.0/24
>>> LAN2: 192.168.101.0/24
>>>
>>> user only use default gateway, it serves both internet and LAN2 (when
>>> user in LAN1)
>>>
>>> if user connects to vpn, it will route to LAN2 through vpn gateway (it
>>> wins over default route)
>>> -----------------------
>>>
>>> Yes and they will still route to LAN1 and internet via default route.
>>>
>>
>> that's what I meant.
>>
>> no vpn connected (from office) - both LAN1, LAN2 are accessed via default
>> route (it is good)
>>
>> vpn connected (from office) - LAN2 is accessed via vpn (it is rather
>> undesirable, but still should work)
>>
>
> Directly accessing LAN1 will not go over VPN, so any access to the company
> network will be direct.
>
> Only if you access VPN hosts will it through the VPN server, but this is
> the only possibility anyway.
>
> You cannot directly speak to VPN clients. You have to go through the
> server.
>
> So I don't see what the issue is.
>
LAN1 and LAN2 are just different floors in a single building.
without vpn bot of them are accesible via default gw (that's good).
when vpn is connected you will go to the different floor via vpn
>
> It's a great idea.
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Openvpn-users mailing list
Openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users
