Sorry Kevan, I did not get your opinion. What do you prefer: a) removing the SVN tag and doing the same version again or b) keeping the old tag and simply releasing a new -M1-RC2 or something?
In case 2, what will we do with the -M1 artifacts and tag? For this case we should have been starting with -RC1, don't we? LieGrue, strub --- Kevan Miller <[email protected]> schrieb am Mo, 2.2.2009: > Von: Kevan Miller <[email protected]> > Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Publish OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M1 > An: [email protected] > Datum: Montag, 2. Februar 2009, 22:27 > On Feb 2, 2009, at 3:44 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > > >> Some projects will name their release candidates > >> and corresponding votes > > > > Or delete the SVN tag and do it again? > > The artifacts have not been published yet... > > > > There is a release:rollback mojo which will do all the > pom-renaming back (which is not needed in our case). The tag > removal is not implemented yet (because tag-removal is not > supported in maven-scm-1.1) and has to be done manually. But > this is marked as TODO in the release plugin code, so my > guess is that that's the way it _should_ work. > > > > btw: I would not use -RC1 but only -M1.1, M1.2, etc > because I personally prefer to use the term 'RC' > only for release candicates of final versions. > > I got a little carried away implying that the artifacts > would contain the RCx name. Can just be used in the > vote/staging directory (unique prefix, etc). Just letting > you know how other projects have handle this. It's not > uncommon to see a RC5 and higher... I think "1.0 > RC1" and a "1.0-M1 RC1" are pretty > descriptive and distinct. However, don't really care... > As long as the project knows what is being voted on, even if > we're having multiple rounds of voting, I'm fine... > > --kevan
