Hi Berthold, On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Berthold; > > 1* OpenWebBeans will implement the full JSR-299 specification. Currently, > nearly all of the functionality of the latest revision of the specification, > except > some Java EE stuffs (like EJB, JMS), is implemented.
correct. Nearly also means, that you are more than welcome to help out ;-) > > But this does not mean that you are not able to use the OpenWebBeans without > full *Java EE 6.0* container. Actually we are trying to separate Java EE > specific parts into > modules (such as EJB 3.x and JMS modules), so anyone can adapt his project to > use any modules he want. Indeed, you can use OpenWebBeans in Java SE > environment also. (You can look at the webbeans-tck that how we use the > implementation for testing without Java EE container. But a bit work may be > needed) > > 2* Name will be the same foreover :) we can change that, if the community really want to change it ... but doing that would only make sense, once this podling leaves (successfully) the incubator -Matthias > > Thanks again; > > /Gurkan > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Berthold Scheuringer <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 7:29:54 PM > Subject: project status > > Hi all, > > I´m pretty new to OpenWebBeans and don´t know that much about the actual > project status (especially considering the latest revise of the > JSR-299 spec). > > Therefore I have following questions: > > 1) first of all the most important question: will OpenWebBeans move onward > implementing the JSR 299 considering the latest revise of the spec (where it > seems to be more like an extension to EJB 3.x ) ? > > > 2) second (not that important) question: if OpenWebBeans will implement the > last spec - will the name still remain > (or will then also a renaming be done toward "Java Contexts and Dependency > Injection") > > > Thanks in advance for answering my pretty fundamental questions. > > Regards, > > Berthold > > > > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
