Hi!

It currently does, because EJB stuff is not implemented yet (working on that)

But the full modularisation is tbd. Expect this for M3 or so.

LieGrue,
strub

--- Berthold Scheuringer <[email protected]> schrieb am Do, 
19.3.2009:

> Von: Berthold Scheuringer <[email protected]>
> Betreff: Re: project status
> An: [email protected]
> Datum: Donnerstag, 19. März 2009, 14:53
> Hi all,
> 
> I just wanted to ask if there are some tasks going on
> regarding the
> modularization of OWB
> (as already mentioned on the mailing list --> separating
> Java EE specific
> parts)
>  - would be nice to have OWB running in a non full Java EE
> environment...
> (without special tricks).
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Berthold
> 
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
> 
> > Hi Berthold;
> >
> > 1* OpenWebBeans will implement the full JSR-299
> specification. Currently,
> > nearly all of the functionality of the latest revision
> of the specification,
> > except
> > some Java EE stuffs (like EJB, JMS), is implemented.
> >
> > But this does not mean that you are not able to use
> the OpenWebBeans
> > without full *Java EE 6.0* container. Actually we are
> trying to separate
> > Java EE specific parts into
> > modules (such as EJB 3.x and JMS modules), so anyone
> can adapt his project
> > to use any modules he want. Indeed, you can use
> OpenWebBeans in Java SE
> > environment also. (You can look at the webbeans-tck
> that how we use the
> > implementation for testing without Java EE container.
> But a bit work may be
> > needed)
> >
> > 2* Name will be the same foreover :)
> >
> > Thanks again;
> >
> > /Gurkan
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Berthold Scheuringer <[email protected]>
> > To: [email protected]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 7:29:54 PM
> > Subject: project status
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I´m pretty new to OpenWebBeans and don´t know that
> much about the actual
> > project status (especially considering the latest
> revise of the
> > JSR-299 spec).
> >
> > Therefore I have following questions:
> >
> > 1) first of all the most important question: will
> OpenWebBeans move onward
> > implementing the JSR 299 considering the latest revise
> of the spec (where
> > it
> > seems to be more like an extension to EJB 3.x ) ?
> >
> >
> > 2) second (not that important) question: if
> OpenWebBeans will implement the
> > last spec -  will the name still remain
> > (or will then also a renaming be done toward "Java
> Contexts and Dependency
> > Injection")
> >
> >
> > Thanks in advance for answering my pretty fundamental
> questions.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Berthold
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Berthold Scheuringer
> +43 664 80508 3919
> 
> Irian Solutions GmbH
> Your JSF powerhouse
> http://www.irian.at
> 



Reply via email to