On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu <cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Matthias; > > Is it possible to change the EG representation after forming the EG? If it
yes, that should be possible. > is possible, and you would like to go on this way, I could take the > responsibility, if there will no problem. +1 That would be a good fit, IMO. If there is another one, let's try to add the second person as well. History: James and I were (long time ago) interested in the 299 EG. However, he got "sick" of it before me :-) So, now it is only me. (-> pretty inactive) > > What is the road map for this changing stuffs? Dunno. Once we have a clear opinion on who (besides Gurkan) is interested in joining the EG, I'll figure it out. -Matthias > > WDYT guys? > > Thanks; > > 2009/4/16 Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> > >> Hi, >> >> I am currently "representing" the ASF on the above JSR. >> However, I never really did much. Also I never really committed >> anything to this podling. I just try to help the community growing >> whenever I have some free time. >> >> I want to step back from the Expert Group. Question is now: >> Does one of you want to be on that EG ? This community would >> make most sense to have an active OWB committer being part >> of the spec/EG. >> >> Thanks! >> Matthias >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> > > > > -- > Gurkan Erdogdu > http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
