On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 6:50 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <[email protected]> wrote: > I saw on the blog of the Resin folks that they have their 299 IMPL > working smoothly together. But, sure, that is "only" a hello world.
Yes, that was another implementation that I've been looking into. What I would *really* love to have is the right API to be able to access what I need as a framework developer in a non-implementation-specific way. That way, I wouldn't have to have special "flavors" of my framework for each implementation that I want to support (I have an "adapter" SPI). The specification should address this, IMHO.
