That is an interesting point. As far as I know the jsr 299 spec does not say anything about reusage of jsf2 annotations. jsf2 has it's own petite DI container with scopes and injection points, but also defines some extra stereotypes in addtion to ManagedBean like FacesComponent, FacesBehavior, FacesConverter, FacesRenderer and some else, which will be registered for their appropriate usage.
I would like to see the registration, instantiation and injection of all those component types to be handled by one mechanism, so developers won't get confused by the way annotations of jsr 214 and 299 are working together. br, Sven 2009/9/2 Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > Hi! > > Theoretically OWB should work with all JSF implementations, but I'm note > sure if it is really that seamless. > E.g. JSF2 also has scope annotations etc and I haven't yet read about what > happens to them in the JSR-299 spec. > I also wrote ex gratia, so MyFaces would only be the prefered test > container since it is an Apache project too. > We have all the sources and I also know a lot of the people who wrote > MyFaces initially. > > But yes, it should finally also work with Mojarra! > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > From: Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]> > > To: [email protected] > > Sent: Wednesday, September 2, 2009 8:06:34 AM > > Subject: Re: September Report Content > > > > Hi; > > > > >>>Just for curiosity: What kind of integration do you have in mind? > Should > > not OWB be integratable with all JSF implementations? > > Yeah, this is the aim of OWB project. Because JSF 2.0 will also be part > of > > the Java EE 6, perfectly OWB lives with it. > > > > Besides, there are some re-definition of the terms in the JSF 2 spec. For > > example, it also defines "Managed Bean Concept". And you already > expressed > > that "resource handling" scenario in JSF 2 has resulted with an > exception > > in a situation OWB + JSF 2. > > > > Maybe Mark, could explain more on the integration points that they are > > necessary for working OWB + JSF 2 together? > > > > >>>Should we add our aim to integrate with JSF-2-0 like e.g. MyFaces > trunk? > > Mark, what do you want to express with saying MyFaces trunk? Do you mean > > integration implementation will be done on MyFaces code base? > > > > Maybe Matthias can help on JSF 2 integration and sheds light. > > > > --Gurkan > > > > > > 2009/9/2 Sven Linstaedt > > > > > Just for curiosity: What kind of integration do you have in mind? > Should > > > not OWB be integratable with all JSF implementations? > > > > > > br, Sven > > > > > > > > > > > > Am 01.09.2009 um 23:12 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > > > > > > > > fine so far. > > >> > > >> Should we add our aim to integrate with JSF-2-0 like e.g. MyFaces > trunk? > > >> > > >> LieGrue, > > >> strub > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> ----- Original Message ---- > > >> > > >>> From: Gurkan Erdogdu > > >>> To: [email protected] > > >>> Sent: Tuesday, September 1, 2009 10:01:26 PM > > >>> Subject: September Report Content > > >>> > > >>> Hi guys; > > >>> > > >>> Reporting schedule is coming soon, last day to send report is > September > > >>> 9. I > > >>> will want to include below content into our report page as a last 3 > > >>> months > > >>> efforts; > > >>> > > >>> WDYT? All your comments are welcome! > > >>> > > >>> --Gurkan > > >>> ----------------------------------- > > >>> > > >>> !OpenWebBeans will be an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299: > > >>> Contexts > > >>> and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is defined as > > >>> JSR-299. > > >>> > > >>> !OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26, 2008. The > following > > >>> items > > >>> have been made after the last report > > >>> > > >>> * We cut a M3 release (under vote) > > >>> * We implemented new spec features, (Portable Extensions, and changed > > >>> APIs) > > >>> * We created a JSR-330 API and integrated with it > > >>> * We integrated with embeddable OpenEJB in Tomcat to support EJB > Beans > > >>> * We implemented 2 new samples related with EJB Beans and JMS > Injections > > >>> * We started a progress to integrate OWB with Apache Geronimo > > >>> > > >>> Belows are the next steps; > > >>> > > >>> * We will release the M4 version. > > >>> * We will integrate with Apache Geronimo > > >>> * We will create more documentation in the wiki > > >>> * We will continue to attract new committers into the project. > > >>> * We will strive to create more community and increase the use of > u...@list > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > -- > > Gurkan Erdogdu > > http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com > > > > >
