Folks, We have been implementing the JSR-299 specification not JSR-330. So we have to pass the JSR-299 TCK. But if the JSR-299 TCK implies that any compatible implementation must also pass the JSR-330 TCK, then it may necessary ti implement it.
--Gurkan ________________________________ From: Mohammad Nour El-Din <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009 12:43:10 PM Subject: Re: jsr-330 TCK IMHO, yes. As long as this JSR is accepted in JCP we should comply with it to respect and the layered dependency on such standard dependency injection specs. As long as we are providing a dependency injection service so IMHO we should comply with this specs. But the question now, I think, is when we are going to be fully compliant with it ? I mean we have to discuss this point. On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi! > > Bob today announced that they will release a TCK for JSR-330. > > My Question: I'm still not sure if JSR-299 is 100% 330 compliant or if we > only use the same annotations to have some 'basic' similarity. > > So, should OWB (and other 299 containers) also comply with this TCK or only > with the 299er suite? > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > -- Thanks - Mohammad Nour - LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/mnour ---- "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving" - Albert Einstein
