Got answers from Pete: * JSR-299 _IS_ JSR-330 compliant * the JSR-299 TCK will include the 330 TCK _only_ as _textual_ requirement and not as technical include. * the ref guide will say "to be 299 compliant you must pass the 330 TCK and the 299 TCK"
LieGrue, strub --- On Mon, 9/14/09, Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: jsr-330 TCK > To: [email protected] > Date: Monday, September 14, 2009, 12:15 PM > >>>Have they mentioned > anything yet? > Not so far. > > --Gurkan > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009 12:55:07 PM > Subject: Re: jsr-330 TCK > > > But if the JSR-299 TCK implies that any > compatible > > implementation must also pass the JSR-330 TCK > > right, that's exactly what I'd like to know. It's not about > OWB, but more a question to the 299 EG. Have they mentioned > anything yet? > > LieGrue, > strub > > > --- On Mon, 9/14/09, Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > From: Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: jsr-330 TCK > > To: [email protected] > > Date: Monday, September 14, 2009, 11:49 AM > > Folks, > > > > We have been implementing the JSR-299 specification > not > > JSR-330. So we have to pass the JSR-299 TCK. But if > > the JSR-299 TCK implies that any compatible > implementation > > must also pass the JSR-330 TCK, then it may necessary > ti > > implement it. > > > > --Gurkan > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Mohammad Nour El-Din <[email protected]> > > To: [email protected] > > Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009 12:43:10 PM > > Subject: Re: jsr-330 TCK > > > > IMHO, yes. As long as this JSR is accepted in JCP we > should > > comply > > with it to respect and the layered dependency on such > > standard > > dependency injection specs. As long as we are > providing a > > dependency > > injection service so IMHO we should comply with this > > specs. > > > > But the question now, I think, is when we are going to > be > > fully > > compliant with it ? I mean we have to discuss this > point. > > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > Bob today announced that they will release a TCK > for > > JSR-330. > > > > > > My Question: I'm still not sure if JSR-299 is > 100% 330 > > compliant or if we only use the same annotations to > have > > some 'basic' similarity. > > > > > > So, should OWB (and other 299 containers) also > comply > > with this TCK or only with the 299er suite? > > > > > > LieGrue, > > > strub > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Thanks > > - Mohammad Nour > > - LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/mnour > > ---- > > "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance > you > > must keep moving" > > - Albert Einstein > > > > > > > > > > >
