cool!

Id favour a webbeans-jsf2, I think that's more future proof.

And as Gurkan already said: please attach the patch as owb-171-patch.rfc in 
Jira.

txs and LieGrue,
strub

--- Sven Linstaedt <[email protected]> schrieb am Do, 17.12.2009:

> Von: Sven Linstaedt <[email protected]>
> Betreff: Integration of JSF2 specific API calls
> An: [email protected]
> Datum: Donnerstag, 17. Dezember 2009, 2:24
> Back in business.
> 
> I am currently working on a patch for OWB-171. Besides some
> cleanups I have refactored the code:
> 
> Conversation is request scoped and solely created or
> restored by ConversationBean which delegates the later one
> to the ConversationManager. WebBeansPhaseListener is only
> responsible for retrieving and handling the
> ConversationContext. Conversation is only restored using the
> "cid" request parameter and not the
> UIViewRoot's attributes, because the view is only
> accessible after restore view phase. The restored
> conversation (and it's context of course) must actually
> exist for restoring the view. This chicken or egg problem
> was the reason not to store the the cid in the view's
> attributes, because restoring these attributes actually
> needs restoring the conversation beforehand.
> 
> 
> There is still an issue with the jsf2-example: In case of
> ajax requests which start a long running conversation, all
> form's action attributes needs to be updated to reflect
> the current active conversation for following request. This
> could be done using JSF2 specific API features. At the
> moment webbeans-impl is purely compiled against the JSF 1.2
> API. Without the necessary abstraction there is no chance to
> get the JSF2 specific ajax functionality working again.
> 
> 
> I have attached the patch to this mail and not to the
> issue, because the patch is not meant for inclusion yet, but
> for testing purposes. Integration it and rerunning the
> jsf2-example points out my problem. If you disable ajax by
> disabling javascript in your browser e.g. the conversation
> example is working, because in this case the full page with
> updated form's action urls is rendered during each
> action invocation.
> 
> 
> Last but not least: Do you guys have a glue how JSF2
> specific extension for conversation handling should be
> integrated? I supose either adding another project
> (webbeans-jsf2 e.g.) or updating the JSF API (not impl)
> version to 2.x and making sure, we are loading JSF2 specific
> classes only for this ajax purpose.
> 
> 
> good night, Sven
> 
> 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen 
Massenmails. 
http://mail.yahoo.com

Reply via email to