On 7/25/07, cappelaere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Example shows: > <if> > <equals field-value="category" other-value="new plant" /> > <participant ref="reviewer-b" /> > <participant ref="reviewer-c" /> > </if> > > This seems a different case than #5. Wouldn't this be more > representative of the spirit of #5? > > <concurrent count="1"> > <participant ref="reviewer-b" /> > <participant ref="reviewer-c" /> > </concurrent>
Hi Pat, the OpenWFEru pattern compliance doc is at : http://openwferu.rubyforge.org/patterns.html The thing is the pattern only focuses on the merge, not the split. In your interpretation of the pattern, the two branches are potentially executed (branch 0 not fast enough at cancelling discarded branch 1). The pattern seem to say that only one branch replies... I still think your version makes sense, I should add it to the description. Best regards, -- John Mettraux -///- http://jmettraux.openwfe.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OpenWFEru users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
