That's great! I would be happy to do some testing or contribute in other
ways, let me know.

--
Raphael.

On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 4:53 PM, John Mettraux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

>
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 3:33 AM, Raphael Simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > sequence :on-error => "rescue" do
> >    participant :ref => '...'
> >    participant :ref => '...'
> >    ...
> > end
> > process_definition :name => "rescue" do
> >    ...
> > end
> >
> > Alternatively and to avoid relying on a language mechanism for raising
> > exceptions, there could be a standard field (e.g. __failed__) that the
> > engine understands and automatically raises an exception when it sees it
> set
> > (effectively doing an implicit raise :if => "${f:__failed__} is set"
> after
> > each expression).
> >
> > One nice thing about this is that combined with the 'redo' expression we
> > effectively have a retry mechanism.
>
> Great, I'll then start implementing this concept starting today. It's
> not that difficult, it will make a very important feature for the next
> release.
>
>
> Thanks a lot, looking forward continuing the collaboration,
>
> --
> John Mettraux   -   http://jmettraux.wordpress.com
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Ruote (OpenWFEru) users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to