On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Kenneth Kalmer <[email protected]>wrote:
> Hi Nic > > Good point you make, I'm feeling the same issue at the moment. My previous > reply has the bulk of the info in on getting pluggable JSON backends in. > > As for testing, I think we'll rely on a good test suite to help keep the > holes plugged. Additionally the OpenWFE::JSON utility class will expose a > couple of convenience methods, but they'll be driven by an encode() and > decode() method, which I'll map the the appropriate backend's methods for > achieving the same. > > I know from time to time we'll be faced with bugs in the backends we use, > but we'll have to deal with that upstream and make sure everyone is aware of > the issue. I know personally that ActiveSupport's JSON helpers had a rough > ride to where they are now, but they're making good progress on aligning it > with the standards. > > It's not a small feat, I've got the local branches and will proceed to see > how it pans out over the next couple of hours. > Turned out it went quite quickly, at least from running the tests... My ruote-rest fork's json branch [1] now uses the changes made to OpenWFE::Json. Best [1] http://github.com/kennethkalmer/ruote-rest/tree/json -- Kenneth Kalmer [email protected] http://opensourcery.co.za @kennethkalmer --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group. to post : send email to [email protected] to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected] more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
