Hi John, About the quick test: yes, it does! I use a double cancel and that is working but it don't know if it is correct...
Regards, Gon On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 5:29 PM, John Mettraux <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 12:23 AM, Gonzalo Suarez > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> sometimes the whole process is cancelled, and sometimes it is not. I >> checked the /history resource for both situations and found that >> whenever the process is not fully cancelled, there is one 'cancel' >> event missing > > Hello again, > > could you please expand on that > >> whenever the process is not fully cancelled, there is one 'cancel' >> event missing > > ? > > what does it look like when it works and what does it look like when > it doesn't ? > >> Sat Apr 10 06:27:59 +0200 2010 expool cancel 20100410-deromoyogi >> process-definition 0 >> >> Is this a buggy behaviour or am I doing something wrong? > > Quick test : does a double-cancel alleviate those issues ? > > > Cheers, > > -- > John Mettraux - http://jmettraux.wordpress.com > > -- > you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" > group. > to post : send email to [email protected] > to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected] > more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en -- you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group. to post : send email to [email protected] to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected] more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en
