On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 10:51:19AM +0200, Asier wrote:
> El 16/06/2010 7:40, John Mettraux escribió:
> >though your initial version should work.
> >
> >Maybe you should fork ruote-amqp on Github and then go on with your 
> >modifications are then send a pull request to Kenneth.
> >
> >I'm here to help as well.
> >
> >BTW, what do you mean by :
> >
> >>The output of the p @options ... doesn't honor its instantiation.
> 
> If I register the participant like:
> 
> | participant :copper, RuoteAMQP::Participant.new(
> |     :reply_by_default => true,
> |     :default_queue => 'ruote')
> 
> Parameters get passed ok, but this kind of registration is
> "stateful" or by-instance, and I've readed that ruote 2.1 needs
> stateless participant, like in:
> 
> | participant :copper, RuoteAMQP::Participant
> 
> I'll take a look at ruote-jig and beanstalk and share experiences here

As said, if you need ruote-amqp and want a version with a fix, just shout.

That's most certainly a bug.

-- 
John Mettraux - http://jmettraux.wordpress.com

-- 
you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group.
to post : send email to [email protected]
to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected]
more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en

Reply via email to