On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 05:54:21PM +0900, John Mettraux wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 10:51:19AM +0200, Asier wrote: > > El 16/06/2010 7:40, John Mettraux escribió: > > >though your initial version should work. > > > > > >Maybe you should fork ruote-amqp on Github and then go on with your > > >modifications are then send a pull request to Kenneth. > > > > > >I'm here to help as well. > > > > > >BTW, what do you mean by : > > > > > >>The output of the p @options ... doesn't honor its instantiation. > > > > If I register the participant like: > > > > | participant :copper, RuoteAMQP::Participant.new( > > | :reply_by_default => true, > > | :default_queue => 'ruote') > > > > Parameters get passed ok, but this kind of registration is > > "stateful" or by-instance, and I've readed that ruote 2.1 needs > > stateless participant, like in: > > > > | participant :copper, RuoteAMQP::Participant > > > > I'll take a look at ruote-jig and beanstalk and share experiences here > > As said, if you need ruote-amqp and want a version with a fix, just shout. > > That's most certainly a bug.
Hello Asier, please have a look at this 2.1.10 version of ruote-amqp http://github.com/jmettraux/ruote-amqp I built it because of this thread here and that conversation : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users/browse_frm/thread/ae522bb42d0c1367 Feel free to build a gem from that repository or to point your Gemfile to it. Feedback is welcome, cheers, -- John Mettraux - http://jmettraux.wordpress.com -- you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group. to post : send email to [email protected] to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected] more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en
