> I'm sorry, but I have the impression you're thinking in the wrong direction. > Daemon-kit provides facilities for ruote participants, not the other way > around.
That's what I said :) > +1 for you patching daemon-kit > > > I still think that that setting a default reply_queue that matches the > > default listening queue of the RouteAMQP::Receiver is good practice > > (although, after having a peek into your fork a decision must be made > > some where wheter 'ruote_workitems' or 'ruote_launchitems' is to be > > default) > > It seems like ruote-amqp takes that decision for us : > > http://github.com/jmettraux/ruote-amqp/blob/ruote2.1/lib/ruote-amqp/r... I think I need to rephrase: I still think that that setting a default reply_queue ==> in RuoteAMQP::Participant <== that matches the default listening queue of the RouteAMQP::Receiver is good practice. -- you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group. to post : send email to [email protected] to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected] more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en
