On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 09:43:57AM -0700, Nathan Stults wrote: > > I guess the question is how would that string be treated by ruote > attribute conditions like :if and :until - as long as they don't do what > ruby does and treat all non-nil values as effectively true, I think that > approach would work pretty well. Personally, I think raising an error in > this case would make the most sense, since the process definition should > probably considered non-operational or corruptible if it contains > conditions important to the functioning of the process definition that > can't be evaluated - but as long as they accept ruby expressions that > can't be evaluated as either true OR false (as opposed to an error) then > mistakes may be hard to detect.
OK, it's in http://github.com/jmettraux/ruote/commit/0718cf630061fc5b13b9ed168af7c7e4fc98eb62 Many thanks, -- John Mettraux - http://jmettraux.wordpress.com -- you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group. to post : send email to [email protected] to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected] more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en
