You're the best John, thanks! Nathan Stults
On Oct 11, 2010, at 3:31 AM, "John Mettraux" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 09:43:57AM -0700, Nathan Stults wrote: >> >> I guess the question is how would that string be treated by ruote >> attribute conditions like :if and :until - as long as they don't do what >> ruby does and treat all non-nil values as effectively true, I think that >> approach would work pretty well. Personally, I think raising an error in >> this case would make the most sense, since the process definition should >> probably considered non-operational or corruptible if it contains >> conditions important to the functioning of the process definition that >> can't be evaluated - but as long as they accept ruby expressions that >> can't be evaluated as either true OR false (as opposed to an error) then >> mistakes may be hard to detect. > > OK, it's in > > > http://github.com/jmettraux/ruote/commit/0718cf630061fc5b13b9ed168af7c7e4fc98eb62 > > > Many thanks, > > -- > John Mettraux - http://jmettraux.wordpress.com > > -- > you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" > group. > to post : send email to [email protected] > to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected] > more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en -- you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group. to post : send email to [email protected] to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected] more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en
