John, I like that summary. :) Pat.
On Nov 8, 2010, at 6:44 PM, John Mettraux wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 09:45:18PM +0100, Asier wrote: >> On Lunes 08 Noviembre 2010 02:02:26 John Mettraux escribió: >> >>> a question in a few words, still requiring a big answer, spreading lots of >>> subjects. >> >> [ ... ] >> >> I know that; usually the simplest questions require great answers ;-) >> >> The "full" process has some configuration of components and some simple >> workflows which >> will evolve in time; it's some kind of bill of materials for a very specific >> domain where >> each two/three years the components change (rules change); workflows can >> change also. >> >> Surely I must re-read your proposition and Patrice's one. > > Hello Asier, > > sorry my answer wasn't meant to be a proposition, it is merely meant to help > you understand the difference between a rule engine and a workflow engine > (hoping you can then decide where and when to apply each of them (or not)). > > Maybe Patrice's message can be summarized as "the workflow engine drives, but > the rule engine decides on left or right when there are bifurcations". > > > Know your tools. > > -- > John Mettraux - http://jmettraux.wordpress.com > > -- > you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" > group. > to post : send email to [email protected] > to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected] > more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en -- you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group. to post : send email to [email protected] to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected] more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en
