It is also being used as the version of the ruote-beanstalk. Why should they track in version number? I feel they should have different numbers. When I generated the gem, I got a gem named ruote-beanstalk-2.3.1.gem.
Mahalo Don French On Oct 9, 2012, at 2:11 PM, John Mettraux <[email protected]> wrote: > 2012/10/10 John Mettraux <[email protected]>: >> >> It's not requiring the same version, it's requiring the same version or a >> more recent (">=" is used). And it's only taking into account major.minor, >> not the patch version. > > Sorry, I'm wrong. It's using major.minor.patch (but not the .subpatch > I use for late minute fixes). > > -- > John Mettraux - http://lambda.io/jmettraux > > -- > you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" > group. > to post : send email to [email protected] > to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected] > more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en -- you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group. to post : send email to [email protected] to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected] more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en
