On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 02:20:34PM -0700, Donald French wrote: > > It is also being used as the version of the ruote-beanstalk. Why should > they track in version number? I feel they should have different numbers. > When I generated the gem, I got a gem named ruote-beanstalk-2.3.1.gem.
I think it's easier for people to understand that ruote-xxx at version 2.3.1 is meant to work with ruote 2.3.1 or better. Best regards, -- John Mettraux - http://lambda.io/jmettraux -- you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group. to post : send email to [email protected] to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected] more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en
