On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 03:48:23AM -0700, Dan Kilman wrote: > > To expand a little. > I would greatly appreciate it if you could still have a small look at the > radial link I've attached to see if there is anything blatantly wrong with > it. We have put a lot of effort on our side trying to optimize the > workflow, but these efforts did not produce sufficient results yet.
Hello, I see nothing wrong with your process definition. It seems a bit convoluted with lots of set/unset and I don't understand the "state" participant. I have to say that you are not putting much effort into issue reporting. So many things to guess on our side. This is a must read by the way: http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html I admire you putting a lot of effort into optimizing your workflow, but I cannot help notice that nowhere in "the opensource cloud orchestration system"text is there any "thanks to the ruote guys for the years of effort they put into their tool" (and ruote isn't the only tool you're using). Kind regards, John -- -- you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group. to post : send email to [email protected] to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected] more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ruote" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
