Following Dan's note above, there is a test case available here: https://github.com/dankilman/mock-workflow-service
Would it be possible to discuss this over IRC? Regards, Barak On Tuesday, April 22, 2014 1:59:59 PM UTC+3, John Mettraux wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 03:48:23AM -0700, Dan Kilman wrote: > > > > To expand a little. > > I would greatly appreciate it if you could still have a small look at > the > > radial link I've attached to see if there is anything blatantly wrong > with > > it. We have put a lot of effort on our side trying to optimize the > > workflow, but these efforts did not produce sufficient results yet. > > Hello, > > I see nothing wrong with your process definition. It seems a bit > convoluted > with lots of set/unset and I don't understand the "state" participant. > > I have to say that you are not putting much effort into issue reporting. > So > many things to guess on our side. > > This is a must read by the way: > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html > > I admire you putting a lot of effort into optimizing your workflow, but > I cannot help notice that nowhere in "the opensource cloud orchestration > system"text is there any "thanks to the ruote guys for the years of effort > they put into their tool" (and ruote isn't the only tool you're using). > > Kind regards, > > John > > -- -- you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group. to post : send email to [email protected] to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected] more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ruote" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
