Hi Ajay, the proposal looks a good start.
As I mentioned to you a few days ago, since you've been involved with the project for some time, I believe this project is too easy for you as it is now. Since you have the talent to do a more complex project or achieve better results, it would be a shame to waste it. I suggest that you add the resolution of some other key github issues of the projects you're going to work on, in order to achieve the following: - push yourself out of the comfort zone and grow more as a developer - help the OpenWISP project - increase the difficulty level of your project for the sake of fairness and adherence to GSoC guidelines Why there's no coding activity planned in the community bonding period? We should spend this time with productive activities, especially the one related to general cleanups and improvements mentioned above. Here's the issue I suggests to take in consideration: *Backward conversion (allowing to store the full UCI configuration of each device into OpenWISP)* - https://github.com/openwisp/netjsonconfig/issues/104 - https://github.com/openwisp/netjsonconfig/issues/100 - add a view in openwisp-controller to capture the full device conf and add the required code in openwisp-config to send it, this could be considered an experimental feature but nonetheless a first step This would be a very useful front to work on, a lot of users expect to find the full configuration of a device in OpenWISP because that's how other controllers work. I hope this helps :) Federico On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 10:14 AM Federico Capoano < federico.capo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Ajay, > > On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 9:12 AM Ajay Tripathi <ajay3...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> 1. I updated this pull request: >> https://github.com/openwisp/openwisp-ipam/pull/27 >> > > Great, will review it asap. > > 2. In `openwisp_radius`, is backward compatibility for settings variable >> names required? I am assuming it's not required since it's not released yet. >> > > Since it's being used in some production systems, it's better to keep > backward compatibility. > > >> 3. I have submitted a draft for GSoC proposal on the website, please >> review :-) >> > > Thanks, I will > > Federico > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OpenWISP" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to openwisp+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/openwisp/CAERYH6VhgVpqHDqo2xYyG1CVQDT4WrLJn4NnHtya8TBvn_JjgQ%40mail.gmail.com.