On Tue, 18 Mar 2008, Harald Schiöberg wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> > but if you go into feeds/packages, do you see the following?
> >
> > drwxrwxr-x 9 rpjday rpjday 4096 2008-03-17 12:39 admin
> > drwxrwxr-x 15 rpjday rpjday 4096 2008-03-17 12:39 ipv6
> > drwxrwxr-x 24 rpjday rpjday 4096 2008-03-17 12:39 lang
> > drwxrwxr-x 115 rpjday rpjday 4096 2008-03-17 12:39 libs
> > drwxrwxr-x 9 rpjday rpjday 4096 2008-03-17 12:39 multimedia
> > drwxrwxr-x 217 rpjday rpjday 4096 2008-03-17 12:39 net
> > lrwxrwxrwx 1 rpjday rpjday 17 2008-03-17 12:40 packages ->
> > ../feeds/packages
> > drwxrwxr-x 4 rpjday rpjday 4096 2008-03-17 12:39 skels
> > drwxrwxr-x 15 rpjday rpjday 4096 2008-03-17 12:39 sound
> > drwxrwxr-x 89 rpjday rpjday 4096 2008-03-17 12:39 utils
> > drwxrwxr-x 15 rpjday rpjday 4096 2008-03-17 12:39 XOrg
> >
> > that's where the useless symlink is. should it be there?
>
> Nope, its not there for me, but none of my build-dirs has been
> distcleaned for quite a while.
hmmm ... curious. i did verify that, before i ran "make
package/symlinks", i had no feeds/ directory. and immediately after i
ran that, that link was there.
how odd. as i mentioned before, i'm using the absolute latest "git
pull" contents of the repo. can anyone else verify that this happens
for them or not? not that it's a big deal, obviously, but if it's not
serving any purpose, why create it?
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry:
Have classroom, will lecture.
http://crashcourse.ca Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
========================================================================_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
