Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Tue, 18 Mar 2008, Imre Kaloz wrote: > >> On 2008.03.18. 15:39:15 Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> > so why hasn't that fix been added to the git repo? >> >> > >> >> >> >> First, the git-repo isn't the official source (just to make sure we >> >> don't confuse people here). >> > >> > (just to be clear, when i refer to the "git repo," i'm assuming i >> > could just as easily be talking about the "svn repo" since i imagine >> > they're kept in sync, yes?) >> > >> > i understand that the version control repos aren't the "official" >> > source for openwrt. but, from a quality assurance and stress >> > testing point of view, if you make them open to the public, you >> > should *hope* that there are people (like me) who are willing to >> > work with them, and hammer on them, and point out where they fail, >> > and even submit patches that fix some of those failures. I currently don't have much time to deal with the patches and unfortunately most of the other devs don't seem to have time either. I'll try to do another patch apply run soon.
> ah, *that's* important, and that wasn't made clear anywhere in the > openwrt docs. so you're saying it's quite possible that the > subversion repo is more up to date than the git one? that's fine with > me, i'm equally happy with either one. You can use the git repo. It's up to date. My box syncs it every few minutes. > more later, time for lunch. and after lunch, i'll grab the svn repo > and see what the difference is. thanks for clearing that up, that may > make a difference. It should not make much of a difference. - Felix _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
