Axel Gembe wrote:
> Imre Kaloz wrote:
>> I share Gregers' view, too.. Also, one central git is a chaotic mess for
>> this,
>> every target would need it's own branch.. Think ddwrt's repo :P
>>
> I dunno how the current situation differs because every target
> effectively *IS* a branch from the generic kernel which is a branch from
> upstream.
> IMHO its only logical to create every target as a branch. I rather think
> it would be a chaotic mess to not use seperate branches.
> Personally I'd love to see an OpenWRT git repository. Even if it just
> auto-imports the patch series from OpenWRT (although I'd favor the other
> way around)
>
My comment was also a way towards: Ok if this should be done, then it
needs to be done in an unconfusing manner - with a bit of thought and
planning towards how such a git repository is to be integrated into what
is already there ;-)
--
Gregers Petersen
People-stuff, layer 8 and anthropology
glp on irc
_______ ________ __
| |.-----.-----.-----.| | | |.----.| |_
| - || _ | -__| || | | || _|| _|
|_______|| __|_____|__|__||________||__| |____|
|__| W I R E L E S S F R E E D O M
KAMIKAZE (bleeding edge) -----------------------
* 10 oz Vodka Shake well with ice and strain
* 10 oz Triple sec mixture into 10 shot glasses.
* 10 oz lime juice Salute!
---------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
