Hi All, You have some very good ideas. I would like to suggest using [requiring] BOTH md5sum and sha1. This is much harder to fake.
I have already seen TWO DIFFERENT VERSIONS of the "same" wireless driver in the wild ??!! It seems that those of us who are successful [openwrt] attract a lot of vultures! "Real time" monitoring of the executable portion of "running" code would probably also be wise. In this way the processor can hopefully eventually notice that code has been "patched" or otherwise changed and cause a reboot. Write once devices look better and better. Comment: There are lots of "smart" people who want to join our party without a proper invitation :)). warm regards to all, Wiz (pen name) On Tue, 16 Jun 2009, Daniel Dickinson wrote: [NON-Text Body part not included] _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
