-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I let your opinion settle into my mind over night. I agree that a single config is enough (config-default). But for the patches folder I would prefer kernel specific names, as they differ in files and line numbers.
Maddes On 03.02.2010 12:29, Imre Kaloz wrote: > Hello, > > NAK. Although some people love to name the config files that way if the > differences > don't conflict, it makes no sense -- it's easier to keep the same config > and add the > extra symbols to it for the newer kernel. Also, if 2.6.32 is working, > there's no reason > to keep .30 around. > > > Imre > > > On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 20:28:22 +0100, Matthias Buecher / Germany > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, > > please execute the following svn commands inside trunk to correct the > names of the orion config file and patches folder: > > svn mv target/linux/orion/config-default > target/linux/orion/config-2.6.30 > > svn mv target/linux/orion/patches/ target/linux/orion/patches-2.6.30/ > > Could any OpenWrt developer do this? kaloz? anyone? > > > [orion] move 2.6.30 configuration and patches to their appropriate names > > Signed-off by: Matthias Buecher <[email protected]> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAktqzeAACgkQUXXT+9wZdbVQFQCeJjMpZADRkhTn+E2ceyow2/0F 7WMAoLRgqWrPASanc8za9YaSydjyZJBZ =H19i -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
