I currently only have ath9k experience with consumer devices, although I have a ath9k 900mhz device on order for testing.
Travis On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 10:44 PM, Larry Vaden <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 7:18 PM, Travis Kemen <[email protected]> wrote: > > As far as OpenWRT goes it works great on the device. I am convinced that > I > > am not getting the full power out of device though with madwifi, I am > able > > to get a better signal on the AP with the sock firmware than I am with > > madwifi (my situations have allowed me to still use it with the decreased > > power output). Madwifi is supposed to have a 10dbm offset to compensate > for > > cards/devices with more than 18dbm. I am not sure of ath5k suffers from > the > > same issue or not, I am planning on testing this week. I have not used > the > > dual polarity model of the powerstation. I have used the dual polarity > > nanostation with openwrt and it works fine with adaptive, vpol or hpol. > > Do you have similar thoughts about ath9k or are you certain that with > ath9k you are getting full power or do you not have any experience > with ath9k? > > IOW, I'm not sure whether the stock firmware is correct or if OpenWrt > is correct; I feel they are different with regard to power, but > haven't come up with a definitive test of that yet. >
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
