On 4/17/11 3:04 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote: > On 2011-04-17 11:39 PM, Benjamin Cama wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Le dimanche 17 avril 2011 à 20:33 +0200, Felix Fietkau a écrit : >>> On 2011-04-17 7:49 PM, Jochen Friedrich wrote: >>> > Signed-off-by: Jochen Friedrich<[email protected]> >>> Applied in r26704 >> >> I heard that 2.6.35 has been chosen as a “flag” version for embedded >> use: http://lwn.net/Articles/413341/ >> Does OpenWRT developers care or not? >> I don't have much opinion about this, but maybe it would be nicer to >> keep it around in case anyone want to base its work on it. > I don't think any of the OpenWrt devs care - and I don't really see the > point in keeping old kernels around just because somebody somewhere > still calls them maintained. > I think it's better for us to keep up with what's happening in Linux > upstream development instead of spending more time on the old stuff. > The kinds of integration work and testing that the organizations > involved in this do is unlikely to be of much use for us, given that > their focus is on different kinds of devices than the ones we work on. > > - Felix
I think it's worth pointing out that .35 got deleted less than 2 weeks after the x86 default version got upgraded from .32... A rising tide is supposed to float all boats, right? -Philip _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
