On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Hauke Mehrtens <[email protected]> wrote: > On 04/27/2011 09:05 PM, Maxim Osipov wrote: >> Hello! >> >> Any comments for this patch? Is it possible to apply it? >> >> Kind regards, >> Maxim >> >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Maxim Osipov <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: Maxim Osipov <[email protected]> >>> --- >>> target/linux/at91/Makefile | 2 +- >>> .../at91/flexibity/base-files/etc/config/dhcp | 27 + >>> .../at91/flexibity/base-files/etc/config/network | 20 + >>> .../at91/flexibity/base-files/etc/config/system | 8 + >>> .../flexibity/base-files/etc/config/transmission | 62 + >>> .../base-files/etc/init.d/custom-user-startup | 22 + >>> target/linux/at91/flexibity/config-2.6.37 | 2514 >>> ++++++++++++++++++++ >>> target/linux/at91/flexibity/image/Makefile | 27 + >>> target/linux/at91/flexibity/target.mk | 16 + >>> 9 files changed, 2697 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >>> create mode 100644 target/linux/at91/flexibity/base-files/etc/config/dhcp >>> create mode 100644 >>> target/linux/at91/flexibity/base-files/etc/config/network >>> create mode 100644 target/linux/at91/flexibity/base-files/etc/config/system >>> create mode 100644 >>> target/linux/at91/flexibity/base-files/etc/config/transmission >>> create mode 100755 >>> target/linux/at91/flexibity/base-files/etc/init.d/custom-user-startup >>> create mode 100644 target/linux/at91/flexibity/config-2.6.37 >>> create mode 100644 target/linux/at91/flexibity/image/Config.in >>> create mode 100644 target/linux/at91/flexibity/image/Makefile >>> create mode 100644 target/linux/at91/flexibity/target.mk >>> > > Hi Maxim, > > I do not have this board or any other board supported by the at91 > target, so I am unable to test anything, but I have some questions. > > Why did you create a new subtarget and why didn't you integrate > flexibity into one of the existing subtargets? > Why does the flexibity subtarget use kernel 2.6.37, but the other > subtargets are using 2.6.38? > > Hauke >
Hi Hauke, The boards are different - so different devices, config, modules, etc. The same with base-files customisation - it cannot be shared with other hardware. Regarding the kernel - I've chosen the most used in OpenWRT kernel version where my patches are already included. 2.6.38 doesn't build for me yet and I don't want too many experimental things. Kind regards, Maxim _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
