Hi! On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Maxim Osipov <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Hauke Mehrtens <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 04/27/2011 09:05 PM, Maxim Osipov wrote: >>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Maxim Osipov <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> Signed-off-by: Maxim Osipov <[email protected]> >>>> --- >>>> target/linux/at91/Makefile | 2 +- >>>> .../at91/flexibity/base-files/etc/config/dhcp | 27 + >>>> .../at91/flexibity/base-files/etc/config/network | 20 + >>>> .../at91/flexibity/base-files/etc/config/system | 8 + >>>> .../flexibity/base-files/etc/config/transmission | 62 + >>>> .../base-files/etc/init.d/custom-user-startup | 22 + >>>> target/linux/at91/flexibity/config-2.6.37 | 2514 >>>> ++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> target/linux/at91/flexibity/image/Makefile | 27 + >>>> target/linux/at91/flexibity/target.mk | 16 + >>>> 9 files changed, 2697 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >>>> create mode 100644 target/linux/at91/flexibity/base-files/etc/config/dhcp >>>> create mode 100644 >>>> target/linux/at91/flexibity/base-files/etc/config/network >>>> create mode 100644 >>>> target/linux/at91/flexibity/base-files/etc/config/system >>>> create mode 100644 >>>> target/linux/at91/flexibity/base-files/etc/config/transmission >>>> create mode 100755 >>>> target/linux/at91/flexibity/base-files/etc/init.d/custom-user-startup >>>> create mode 100644 target/linux/at91/flexibity/config-2.6.37 >>>> create mode 100644 target/linux/at91/flexibity/image/Config.in >>>> create mode 100644 target/linux/at91/flexibity/image/Makefile >>>> create mode 100644 target/linux/at91/flexibity/target.mk >> >> Why did you create a new subtarget and why didn't you integrate >> flexibity into one of the existing subtargets? >> Why does the flexibity subtarget use kernel 2.6.37, but the other >> subtargets are using 2.6.38? >> > The boards are different - so different devices, config, modules, etc. > The same with base-files customisation - it cannot be shared with > other hardware. Regarding the kernel - I've chosen the most used in > OpenWRT kernel version where my patches are already included. 2.6.38 > doesn't build for me yet and I don't want too many experimental > things. >
Any more comments? Any changes necessary to apply the patch? Kind regards, Maxim _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
