On Friday 02 September 2011 12:55:08 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 12:39, Luka Perkov <open...@lukaperkov.net> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 10:46:37AM +0200, Florian Fainelli wrote: > >> On Friday 02 September 2011 00:55:54 Luka Perkov wrote: > >> > Also in linux-2.6.39.4/kernel/Kconfig.preempt you will see for > >> > CONFIG_PREEMPT: > >> > > >> > Select this if you are building a kernel for a desktop or > >> > embedded system with latency requirements in the milliseconds > >> > range > > > > Please look at the kernel config file above. You will see that > > CONFIG_PREEMPT should be used on embedded systems... > > ... with latency requirements in the milliseconds range.
Indeed, that's the part I am concerned with, along with the memory footprint. Any code should be able to work with and without Preemption enabled. Your patch remains a workaround for now. -- Florian _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
