On 2011-12-02 10:06 AM, Marek Lindner wrote: > On Friday, December 02, 2011 17:05:01 Felix Fietkau wrote: >> > Out of curiosity: Since ath9k works without your patch what makes you >> > think it is an EEPROM problem ? Before your patch came there was only >> > the EEPROM setting and nothing else. >> >> Since I didn't have all information yet, I've been looking into various >> hypothetical scenarios in which the patch could fail. One of those >> scenarios was EEPROM indicating multiple antennas, but based on the >> other bit of information above, that does not seem to be the case. >> >> I think I now have an idea what could be the issue. I'll hack up a patch >> and send it to you for testing. > > Ok, thanks! Actually, now that I think about it, I can't come up with any lilely scenario with my patches where the available antennas would show up as 0 for tx and rx. Are you sure you gave me this info when running a driver without your revert patch?
- Felix _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
