Maybe you are lucky and someone steps up. You are probably better of finding the maintainer (if there's one) directly by looking at the revision log or asking in the openwrt irc channel. The mailing list is often slow in this regard. If it all does not happen in time frame you planned in then you still have the do-it-yourself option.
..ede On 19.03.2012 12:05, Christiane Ruetten wrote: > Hi Edgar, > > just to be explicit: the idea is to have lighttpd-nossl in the > official repo so I can get away with distributing a single > platform-independent opkg. So I was hoping that the current > maintainer could simply add a -nossl build instead of me having > to reproduce the complete build effort. > > What I could do, though, is provide for a package/lighttpd-nossl/ > Makefile and company and someone else adds it to the official > build system, but chances are that testing my changes, and generally > making sure I didn't screw up might surpass the effort that > a knowledgable maintainer requires for a copy/modify operation > on the current package repo. > > I might be wrong there, and am grateful for any advice on > how to proceed. > > Cheers, > Christiane > > > Am 19.03.12 11:30, schrieb edgar.sol...@web.de: >> On 19.03.2012 10:52, Christiane Ruetten wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> would you be able to easily add a variant of the lighttpd >>> package without the massive libopenssl dependency? It is almost >>> completely filling up the flash in 4 MByte routers, leaving >>> almost no headroom for further functionality, and https is not >>> always required. >>> >>> I am currently in the process of rewriting the PirateBox >>> wifi deaddrop service in an OpenWRT-friendly way. The current >>> target router chosen by the PirateBox community is the >>> TL-MR3020 which unfortunately only has 4 MByte flash. >>> Installing just lighttpd with rewrite and cgi and minimal >>> modules for USB storage takes the system from 1.4M to under >>> 100K of free flash. >>> >> >> hi christiane, >> >> take a look at the lighttpd makefile >> https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/packages/net/lighttpd/Makefile >> how webdav is build in as selectable package. >> >> you could do something similar to the currently hard coded openssl support. >> >> ..ede >> _______________________________________________ >> openwrt-devel mailing list >> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
