had a look at irssi. does this actually work when both packages are selected? don't you end up with two packages both containing whatever was build first?
..ede On 19.03.2012 13:18, Peter Wagner wrote: > Hi, > > look at the ctorrent or irssi Makefile. There you can see how to implement > the > nossl stuff in one Makefile. > > Regards, > Peter > On Monday 19 March 2012 12:05:31 Christiane Ruetten wrote: >> Hi Edgar, >> >> just to be explicit: the idea is to have lighttpd-nossl in the >> official repo so I can get away with distributing a single >> platform-independent opkg. So I was hoping that the current >> maintainer could simply add a -nossl build instead of me having >> to reproduce the complete build effort. >> >> What I could do, though, is provide for a package/lighttpd-nossl/ >> Makefile and company and someone else adds it to the official >> build system, but chances are that testing my changes, and generally >> making sure I didn't screw up might surpass the effort that >> a knowledgable maintainer requires for a copy/modify operation >> on the current package repo. >> >> I might be wrong there, and am grateful for any advice on >> how to proceed. >> >> Cheers, >> Christiane >> >> Am 19.03.12 11:30, schrieb [email protected]: >>> On 19.03.2012 10:52, Christiane Ruetten wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> would you be able to easily add a variant of the lighttpd >>>> >>>> package without the massive libopenssl dependency? It is almost >>>> completely filling up the flash in 4 MByte routers, leaving >>>> almost no headroom for further functionality, and https is not >>>> always required. >>>> >>>> I am currently in the process of rewriting the PirateBox >>>> >>>> wifi deaddrop service in an OpenWRT-friendly way. The current >>>> target router chosen by the PirateBox community is the >>>> TL-MR3020 which unfortunately only has 4 MByte flash. >>>> Installing just lighttpd with rewrite and cgi and minimal >>>> modules for USB storage takes the system from 1.4M to under >>>> 100K of free flash. >>> >>> hi christiane, >>> >>> take a look at the lighttpd makefile >>> >>> https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/packages/net/lighttpd/Makefile >>> >>> how webdav is build in as selectable package. >>> >>> you could do something similar to the currently hard coded openssl >>> support. >>> >>> ..ede >>> _______________________________________________ >>> openwrt-devel mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel >> >> _______________________________________________ >> openwrt-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
