On 5 November 2012 04:16, Catalin Patulea <c...@vv.carleton.ca> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Jonas Gorski > <jonas.gorski+open...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Also I'm not sure the location is correct - maybe it should rather be >> linux/mtd/bcm963xx_tag.h or mtd/bcm963xx_tag.h something like that - >> linux/ is just so ... generic. > Hmm, maybe.. but I don't see any clear precedent for linux/mtd, and > myloader.h was in linux/mtd so I figured better to keep all instances > in one place. If at some point there is a clear reason to move to > linux/mtd, they can all be moved at once. What do you think?
myloader.h isn't upstream, but OpenWrt local, so it's easy to move "all" of the headers into a different location. >> Also, can you please submit this upstream, too? I think the idea is >> good, it's just some details that need to be fixed. > Sounds good, will do. I'll wait until we iron out the kinks here though? Yes, please. Although it might mean ironing out more things by then ;-). >> Oh, and don't forget that there is a linux-3.6 also in trunk. > Same - I'll get the patch cleaned up for the current linux, then I > will port to linux-3.6. I guess 3.6 introduces UAPI, so that might be > a different beast entirely. Haven't looked at 3.6 in detail there, so I can't really comment here. Jonas _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
