On 14 Feb 2014, at 01:04, Roman Yeryomin <leroi.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 14 February 2014 00:34, Mikko Hissa <mikko.hi...@werzek.com> wrote:
>> In rt2800lib.c function rt2800_get_txwi_rxwi_size()
>> Add case MT7620 with RT5592.
>>
>> *txwi_size = TXWI_DESC_SIZE_5WORDS;
>> *rxwi_size = RXWI_DESC_SIZE_6WORDS;
>> break;
>>
>
> I suppose you mean RT5390 because:
> ieee80211 phy0: rt2x00_set_rt: Info - RT chipset 5390, rev 0500 detected
>
> Also as far as I understand (from datasheet) it's not the same as
> RT5592. Correct me if I'm wrong.
> So I added:
>
> case RT5390:
> *txwi_size = TXWI_DESC_SIZE_5WORDS;
> *rxwi_size = RXWI_DESC_SIZE_4WORDS;
> break;
They should be 5 and 6 words not 5 and 4!
*txwi_size = TXWI_DESC_SIZE_5WORDS;
*rxwi_size = RXWI_DESC_SIZE_6WORDS;
break;
The original driver detects MT7620 by chip id 0x5390 and bus type. The driver
in rt2x00 for RT5390 is for a another chip. So you might not want to run the
bits of code meant for RT5390 but create some dummy definition for MT7620 and
set it in rt2800_probe_rt().
Best Regards,
Mikko
> But seems it didn't change anything.
>
> Regards,
> Roman
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
