Le 19/03/2014 23:22, Michel Stempin a écrit : > > > Le 15/02/2014 12:02, Roman Yeryomin a écrit : >> On 14 February 2014 20:43, Mikko Hissa <mikko.hi...@werzek.com> wrote: >>> >>> On 14 Feb 2014, at 01:04, Roman Yeryomin <leroi.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 14 February 2014 00:34, Mikko Hissa <mikko.hi...@werzek.com> wrote: >>>>> In rt2800lib.c function rt2800_get_txwi_rxwi_size() >>>>> Add case MT7620 with RT5592. >>>>> >>>>> *txwi_size = TXWI_DESC_SIZE_5WORDS; >>>>> *rxwi_size = RXWI_DESC_SIZE_6WORDS; >>>>> break; >>>>> >>>> >>>> I suppose you mean RT5390 because: >>>> ieee80211 phy0: rt2x00_set_rt: Info - RT chipset 5390, rev 0500 detected >>>> >>>> Also as far as I understand (from datasheet) it's not the same as >>>> RT5592. Correct me if I'm wrong. >>>> So I added: >>>> >>>> case RT5390: >>>> *txwi_size = TXWI_DESC_SIZE_5WORDS; >>>> *rxwi_size = RXWI_DESC_SIZE_4WORDS; >>>> break; >>> >>> They should be 5 and 6 words not 5 and 4! >>> >>> *txwi_size = TXWI_DESC_SIZE_5WORDS; >>> *rxwi_size = RXWI_DESC_SIZE_6WORDS; >>> break; >> >> You are right, it's 5 and 6 words - I misread the datasheet. Also >> seems there is a typo first stating txwi is 4 words but describing 5 >> below. >> Anyway I tried txwi 5 and rxwi 6 and results are the same. >> >>> The original driver detects MT7620 by chip id 0x5390 and bus type. The >>> driver in rt2x00 for RT5390 is for a another chip. So you might not want to >>> run the bits of code meant for RT5390 but create some dummy definition for >>> MT7620 and set it in rt2800_probe_rt(). >>> >> >> Ook.. I'll try to separate and clean that. > > Any news regarding the MT7620 WiFi? > > Regards, > Michel
There is nowadays a lot of OpenWrt-based code featuring MT7620 WiFi flourishing on the Web: <http://downloads.openwrt.org.cn/PandoraBox/ralink/mt7620/packages/> <https://github.com/qdk0901/openwrt-mt7620> <https://app.box.com/s/fqmmhqyykyw63350cpg1> Especially regarding the first link which looks like it is coming directly from the Chinese OpenWrt developers, what is the exact status of these files? Digging into the sources, you find some blobs and/or prominent copyright notices that make me dubious about their legality... Does anybody can explain what is the official mt7620 support status in OpenWrt? Regards, Michel > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel > _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
