There is something that still don't understand: why is there so much interest in the WRT1900ac? A Wandboard quad + i.e. TL-WDR7500 is a more exciting, more powerful and more versatile combo. It is a bit funny to take a look at the code which include a binary patch. Direct Link: ftp://Temp90523934364:[email protected]/Temp90523934364
In addition there are very interesting comments in the mailing list: https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2014-April/024589.html In this moment i'm much more interested in test Jonas' jffs2 patch for the BCM63XX target. Regards: Pepe 2014-04-07 14:49 GMT+02:00, Fernando Frediani <[email protected]>: > NDA = $$$ = Quiet > > I just don't understand what is the problem, if it's really true, to > tell the most interested people (developers) that you are working on > something directly related to the project, even without giving any > further details due the NDA. > > > On 06/04/2014 11:17, Hartmut Knaack wrote: >> Gerry Rozema schrieb: >>> On 28/03/14 01:58 PM, Peter Lawler wrote: >>>> "Hi Pete! We are working with one of the OpenWRT founders and his >>>> team. We'll be sharing more details later... Stay tuned! :)" >>> https://dev.openwrt.org/wiki/people >>> >>> Two listed there as founders, and I'm one of the two. >>> >>> Isn't me, so it must be Mike >> Mike, are you still alive and on the list? >>> _______________________________________________ >>> openwrt-devel mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> openwrt-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel > _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
