On 21/04/2014 10:36, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
> On 21 April 2014 11:05, John Crispin <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 21/04/2014 05:18, Claudio Leite wrote:
>>> The Airlink101 AR725W is a RT2880 router with 32MB RAM, 4MB
>>> flash, 100mbit IP175E switch and dual-band 802.11n wireless.
>>>
>>> Notes: - I couldn't get the switch to be recognized without
>>> building it into the kernel, rather than as a module. Since
>>> the driver has it attached to the ethernet port, it needs(?) to
>>> be present when the eth device is probed.
>>
>> adding the phy driver to the kernel config is the correct
>> approach
>
> Which leads to larger kernel for all devices even without that
> switch and those which have other switches. I think this was
> discussed before. The boards with rtl8366xx don't have them
> explicitly enabled in target kernel config, all is done via kernel
> package. Correct me if I'm wrong?
>
i have never done so for any target i think. which target does this ?
rtl8366xx is not a phy driver but uses smi which makes it loadable
independent of the netdevcie bring up.
not having ip175e in the kernel will lead to us having to ship
ralink_soc_eth as a ko aswell i think.
correct me if i am a wrong ...
John
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
