Steven Barth <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Steven Barth <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > - Added support for 464XLAT (CLAT)
>>
>> Is this signaled in some way by DHCPv6?
>> If so, I imagine that there is an RFC# which says how it works, could be
>> listed here, so that google will find CC when people look for it...
> There seems to be no standardized RFC for this yet, as Bjorn pointed out.
All I'm suggesting is that it say:
- Added support for 464XLAT (CLAT) based upon RFC6877
(includes using heuristic to discover the PLAT side)
if one supported the new DHCPv6 option, then one would say instead:
- Added support for 464XLAT (CLAT) based upon RFC6877
(includes using heuristic to discover the PLAT side,
and supporting DHCPv6 option in draft-cui-intarea-464xlat-prefix-dhcp-00)
it's just google fodder so that IETF people can find the code, and
OpenWRT people can find the specification :-)
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
