Ok thanks for the suggestion. I added some ietf references to the homepage.
Cheers, Steven Am 22. Mai 2015 16:29:12 MESZ, schrieb Michael Richardson <[email protected]>: > >Steven Barth <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Steven Barth <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > - Added support for 464XLAT (CLAT) > >> > >> Is this signaled in some way by DHCPv6? >>> If so, I imagine that there is an RFC# which says how it works, >could be > >> listed here, so that google will find CC when people look for it... > >> There seems to be no standardized RFC for this yet, as Bjorn pointed >out. > >All I'm suggesting is that it say: > >- Added support for 464XLAT (CLAT) based upon RFC6877 > (includes using heuristic to discover the PLAT side) > >if one supported the new DHCPv6 option, then one would say instead: > >- Added support for 464XLAT (CLAT) based upon RFC6877 > (includes using heuristic to discover the PLAT side, >and supporting DHCPv6 option in >draft-cui-intarea-464xlat-prefix-dhcp-00) > > >it's just google fodder so that IETF people can find the code, and >OpenWRT people can find the specification :-)
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
