>There is nothing about upgrading U-Boot on the device from this e-mail topic.
but there is about upgrading firmware via u-boot and according to the above linked kresin comment that procedure is unreliable On 30/12/2018, Mathias Kresin <[email protected]> wrote: > 30/12/2018 15:15, Tom Psyborg: >> On 30/12/2018, Piotr Dymacz <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi Tom, >>> >>> On 30.12.2018 15:03, Tom Psyborg wrote: >>> >>> [...] >>> >>>>>>> If it's possible to update from the stock firmware via a >>>>>>> webinterface, >>>>>>> it's fine. If not, the way via u-boot works as well. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Mathias >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Aren't you embarrassed being such a hypocrite liar? >>>>> >>>>> Prove your point or troll somewhere else. >>>>> >>>>> Mathias >>>>> >>>> >>>> No u-boot upgrade, remember? >>>> https://github.com/lede-project/source/pull/1246#issuecomment-320228337 >>> >>> u-boot upgrade != upgrade via u-boot. >>> >>> -- >>> Cheers, >>> Piotr >>> >> >> Hi >> >> No, there was no misunderstanding. For kresin u-boot upgrade doesn't >> lead to a working router even if one knows how to READ documentation >> that explains upgrade via u-boot. >> > Are you on a vendetta? > > The install instructions from this patch recommends to do the initial > OpenWrt installation via bootloader recovery. Nowhere a replacement of > the preinstalled bootloader is mentioned. > > My linked comment rather proves my point, as I asked to test the > provided instructions to do the initial OpenWrt installation via > bootloader commandline instead of using the stock webinterface hack > (which I asked to add to the wiki instead). > it proves exactly what i replied in this mail to pope2k > Anyway, thanks for the chat > Mathias > what chat? i do not use chatrooms, ever _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
