On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 3:31 PM Christian Lamparter <chunk...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thursday, February 28, 2019 7:52:06 PM CET Adrian Schmutzler wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Dmitry’s patch > > > > > > > > [OpenWrt-Devel] ath79: speed up ath9k-eeprom extraction > > > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1046790/ > > > > > > > > got marked “Superseded” together with my old stuff. > > > > > > > > However, my latest patchset is supposed to be _on top_ of this patch, > > not to supersede it (_my_ own old patches are correctly superseded…); > > so status there should be updated. > > K, I re"newd" Dimitry's patch, but I think you hit the problem right on > the head whit went down: "my latest patchset is supposed to be _on > top_ of this patch [...]". Because I saw that your earlier patches series > v1 and (then later v2) conflicted with Dmitry's patch and archieved them > all back then. (In fact, now I'm not sure if I set the patch to > superseeded when you sent v1, v2 or v3. If it's important to know the exact > time, I think Dmitry could tell when he got the notification from patchwork.) > > Regards, > Christian > > PS: Please check your mailbox, I think Rosen Penev gave you a > Tested-by: tag that got seemingly lost. Having this feedback from > others is a valuable commodity. This is true. I've also tested this patchset on an Archer C7v2. Works fine.
Does patchwork add the tag automatically? > > > > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel