> -----Original Message----- > From: openwrt-devel [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Rosen Penev > Sent: Freitag, 1. März 2019 03:17 > To: Christian Lamparter <[email protected]> > Cc: OpenWrt Development List <[email protected]>; Adrian > Schmutzler <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Wrong patch status > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 3:31 PM Christian Lamparter <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > On Thursday, February 28, 2019 7:52:06 PM CET Adrian Schmutzler wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > Dmitry’s patch > > > > > > > > > > > > [OpenWrt-Devel] ath79: speed up ath9k-eeprom extraction > > > > > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1046790/ > > > > > > > > > > > > got marked “Superseded” together with my old stuff. > > > > > > > > > > > > However, my latest patchset is supposed to be _on top_ of this patch, > > > not to supersede it (_my_ own old patches are correctly superseded…); > > > so status there should be updated. > > > > K, I re"newd" Dimitry's patch, but I think you hit the problem right on > > the head whit went down: "my latest patchset is supposed to be _on > > top_ of this patch [...]". Because I saw that your earlier patches series > > v1 and (then later v2) conflicted with Dmitry's patch and archieved them > > all back then. (In fact, now I'm not sure if I set the patch to > > superseeded when you sent v1, v2 or v3. If it's important to know the exact > > time, I think Dmitry could tell when he got the notification from > > patchwork.) > > > > Regards, > > Christian > > > > PS: Please check your mailbox, I think Rosen Penev gave you a > > Tested-by: tag that got seemingly lost. Having this feedback from > > others is a valuable commodity. > This is true. I've also tested this patchset on an Archer C7v2. Works fine. > > Does patchwork add the tag automatically?
It did, but for the v1-Patchset. I actually remembered the Tested-by and looked when I did the new patchset, but did not find it anymore (due to some circumstances...) Since I have to resend anyway, I will check whether the Tested-by is still applicable and add it then. Best Adrian > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > openwrt-devel mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel > > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
pgp44gY7ZrXhI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
